|  | | 1918 FLU VIRUS HAD THE POWER TO TURN THE HUMAN BODY TO DESTROY ITSELF....AND THUS SO EASILY KILLED 50 MILLION PEOPLE IN THE WORLD IN LESS THAN A YEAR. Posted by Vishva News Reporter on November 12, 2007
 | 
 |   
  
    | 
     SECRET OF CREATION OF 
    LIFE:....IT IS GENES..
 BUT WHAT MAKES GENES COME ALIVE?
 1918 FLU KILLING 50 MILLION PEOPLE 
    REVEALS CREATION OF LIFE
 AND TAKING OF LIFE
 NEWS FLASH:  
      
      In the second only of its kind laboratory 
      in the world, the Canada's National Microbiology Laboratory in Winnipeg, 
      Manitoba, with Level 4 biosafety certification, 
      eight carefully crafted genes were inserted into cells along with a few 
      proteins. Within hours, the cells were taking instructions from the 
      inserted genes and mass-producing copies of the 1918 deadly lethal flu 
      virus
      This enlivening of the 1918 flu virus 
      uncovered evidence of what made the microbe such a relentless killer -- 
      it turns the body against itself and thus 
      managed to kill 50 million people worldwide.
      While U.S. scientists collaborated on the 
      research, the scientists say the live 1918 virus will not leave the 
      Winnipeg lab. The U.S. version of the virus is stored in a federal lab in 
      Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
      The Winnipeg lab is a "fortress within a 
      fortress" -- is designed for working on the most deadly pathogens in the 
      world. 
      Some question the wisdom of resurrecting 
      extinct pathogens. U.S. microbiologist Richard Ebright, at Rutgers 
      University, says the 1918 virus should never have been recreated. He says 
      creating it again in Winnipeg increases the risk the virus could escape 
      and sets a "dangerous precedent" for other labs.
      The research puts Canada's National 
      Microbiology Laboratory in Winnipeg on the map as the second place in the 
      world to resurrect the virus. U.S. scientists were the first to bring the 
      extinct virus to life in 2005.
 | vEDIK 
    CONTEXT OF TODAY'S NEWS STORY PVAF is publishing this news story through its primary 
    mandate to spread knowledge among the entire humanity on this planet 
    earth.... Today's news story is the currently "hot" science of 
    genetics and Gnome research to find out why, what, how and when of creation 
    and sustenance of life...... And this current search for origin, meaning and purpose of 
    life through science is what the sciences of vED
    is all about...vED is 
    left for humans in sNskRUt language which is only deciphered to about 10 
    percent, meaning 90 percent of the knowledge in 
    vED texts cannot be understood by the current humanity.  The 
     
    vED knowledge  is highly complex sciences of life and creation 
    and is very 
    comprehensive and holistically interactive unlike current sciences which 
    have only recently started talking to each other.  One of the difficulty in 
    understand vED in its sNskRUt 
    language is its missing grammar. Presently the 
    sNskRUt vED texts are deciphered 
    mainly through the sNskRUt grammar 
    figured out by India's paaANini 
    sometime 
    circa 520–460 BC. 
    paaANini and composed in 3959 
    suuTR (aphorisms)  in 
    aSHtaaDHyaayi (eight chapters). Even this
    paaANini 
    grammar is pretty difficult to understand as the use of the
    vEDik sNskRUt language has been 
    lost for at least 5000 years now.... In vED any 
    creation from a stone to a highly complex living being such as man is 
    composed of two parts: an aat`maa (soul)
    and the physical body in which the aatmaa resides, makes it 
    functional and controls...aat`maa 
    is eternal and keeps on taking new bodies when the current body 
    becomes old and/or dies...the successive bodies created and taken by 
    aat`maa itself are primary to partake 
    the kARm-fl (fruits of its
    kARm performed in previous 
    lives).....and it is not a misprint - even a stone has an
    aat`maa....   The current science does not believe in metaphysics and 
    hence is constantly refusing to deal with aat`maa and deals with the 
    physical  bodies.  PVAF invites you to share your thoughts on a comparative 
    study of the knowledge of today's story and the 
    vED knowledge presented by Shrii 
    Champaklal Dajibhai Mistry of Edmonton, Alberta, Canada in this 
    right column from his vED library...Please 
    supplement this vED knowledge of  
    today with a vast amount of vED knowledge 
    that is contained in this web site.... And present your comparative study by 
    sharing it as your comment by clicking on the POST 
    A COMMENT button in the header of this news item....or 
    alternatively email your comparative study to PVAF for publication by 
    clicking 
    here..... 
       |  Please click on the next line to continue enlightening 
yourself with in-depth understanding of knowledge of today's news story as it 
could save you and the entire humanity one day with a pandemic similar to the 
1918 flu which killed 50 million people in less than a year....that is just 
about the same number of people killed in the second world war at a bombing and 
bullet cost of trillions of dollars including all the destruction of buildings 
and all made infrastructure needed for humans to live and sustain....the 
flu virus did not spend any money: so where did it get all the power to destroy 
50 million humans????!!!!!  
 
 |  |   
  
    | Scientist unravel secret 
    of deadly 1918 flu virus
 Relentless micro-killer
 turns body against itself
 to drown the victim
 Edmonton 
    Journal: CanWest News Service: January 18, 
    2007: Margaret Munro, 
 Scientists have resurrected the 1918 flu virus in Winnipeg, 
    Manitoba, Canada and uncovered evidence of what made the microbe such a 
    relentless killer -- it turns the body against itself.
 
 In experiments that entailed infecting monkeys, the researchers have shown 
    the virus sends the immune systems into overdrive, flooding the lungs with 
    fluids that drown its victims. The scientists say this helps explain why so 
    many healthy young adults died as the 1918 flu pandemic swept the world 
    killing up to 50 million -- more people than died in the First World War.
 
 The research also is expected to provide tips to halt future pandemics and 
    protect front-line workers.
 "That's what this is all about," says Michael Katze of the 
    University of Washington in Seattle, a member of the international team that 
    describes the monkey experiments in the journal Nature, which is published 
    today.
 The research puts Canada's National Microbiology Laboratory in Winnipeg on 
    the map as the second place in the world to resurrect the virus. U.S. 
    scientists were the first to bring the extinct virus to life in 2005.
 
 The Canadian virus was made using viral genes produced by Yoshihiro 
    Kawaoka's team at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.
 The genes, replicas of DNA pulled from a woman who died of 
    the 1918 flu and was buried in Alaskan permafrost, were sent to the Level 4 
    biosafety lab in Winnipeg where Canadian researchers brought the virus to 
    life.
 "The procedure was not all that difficult," says Dr. Darwyn 
    Kobasa,  a researcher 
    at the Manitoba lab. He says the eight carefully 
    crafted genes were inserted into cells along with a few proteins. Within 
    hours, the cells were taking instructions from the inserted genes and 
    mass-producing copies of the 1918 flu virus.
 
 Last January, he and his colleagues produced millions of copies of the virus 
    in a bid to understand why the 1918 flu was so deadly. Ten macaque monkeys 
    from a breeding colony in Ottawa were used for the experiment.
 
 Animal-care workers at the Winnipeg lab spent about two weeks working and 
    interacting with the animals before the experiment -- "so they'd get used to 
    seeing the people in the blue (biosafety) suits and begin interacting with 
    them," says Kelly Keith, communications manager for the lab.
 
 On the day of the experiment the monkeys were put to sleep with anesthetic. 
    Three monkeys were exposed to conventional flu virus and seven to the 1918 
    virus. Flu-virus-laden solution was dripped into their noses, lungs and 
    eyes. Each one received an estimated seven million viruses. "It's never been 
    done before," says Kobasa, explaining why they used so many viruses to 
    ensure infection.
 
 The monkeys were kept under close observation after they awoke.
 The animals exposed to conventional flu virus developed 
    symptoms but soon recovered. The animals exposed to the 1918 strain grew ill 
    and kept getting worse. Within days their lungs filled with fluid and blood 
    and they laboured to breathe.
 The scientists intended to observe the animals for 21 days, but the monkeys 
    grew so ill, so fast, they were euthanized by day eight of the experiments.
 
 "The idea is to stop the experiment before we cause a lot of stress and 
    trauma to the animals," says Kobasa. The experiment was approved by the 
    Canadian Council on Animal Care and officials at the Public Health Agency of 
    Canada, which is responsible the lab.
 
 Tissues samples reveal that the 1918 virus caused the monkey's immune 
    systems to go haywire, pumping out large amounts of cytokines -- a so-called 
    cytokine storm, or a flood of compounds that can block airways and result in 
    suffocation -- that contributed to the disease's lethality.
 
 | In humans, the flu normally hits the elderly and children hardest. But in 
    1918 millions of 20- to 30-year-olds died. The researchers say their healthy 
    immune systems likely went into overdrive when confronted with the virus.
 
 "Essentially, people are drowned," says Kawaoka.
 
 It "sort of breaks the paradigm that one thinks of 
    the host response as always protective," says Katze.
 
 The scientists are trying to tease out exactly what happens at the molecular 
    and genetic level.
 
 They say the 1918 virus may hold clues to the next pandemic, which many fear 
    could be caused by the H5N1 bird virus if it starts to transmit from person 
    to person. "H5N1 virus can also cause very serious disease and it seems to 
    do this in a way that's quite similar to the 1918 virus," says Kobasa.
 
 Some question the wisdom of resurrecting extinct pathogens. U.S. 
    microbiologist Richard Ebright, at Rutgers University, says the 1918 virus 
    should never have been recreated. He says creating it again in Winnipeg 
    increases the risk the virus could escape and sets a "dangerous precedent" 
    for other labs.
 
 But many observers say the Winnipeg work is important.
 
 "You have to be proactive, you have to work with the devil somewhat to 
    figure out what is going on," says virologist Earl Brown of the University 
    of Ottawa.
 
 He says there are safety concerns, but the Winnipeg lab -- which Brown 
    describes as a "fortress within a fortress" -- is designed for working on 
    the most deadly pathogens.
 
 And he says the research is paying off, given the "powerful" results. One of 
    the more intriguing revelations is that the virus did not stimulate a lot of 
    interferon production, which is normally one of the body's first lines of 
    defence.
 
 "It looks like it was very stealthily moving through and not turning on 
    certain switches," says Brown.
 
 Katze and Kawaoka argue that working with the 1918 flu in animals is 
    essential to prepare for future pandemics.
 
 Should a pathogen, such as the 1918 virus, reappear, it would be critical to 
    know how the immune system would
 
 respond and how to control unwanted reactions.
 
 "One could imagine that the first responders -- the people on the front 
    lines in the hospital -- could perhaps be treated with a combination of 
    drugs, say antiviral drugs like Tamiflu and drugs that already exist to 
    control the inflammatory response," says Katze.
 
 While U.S. scientists collaborated on the research, the scientists say 
    the live 1918 virus will not leave the Winnipeg lab. The U.S. version of the 
    virus is stored in a federal lab in Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
 
 Kobasa says there are plans to infect more monkeys and other animals, 
    perhaps ferrets. He couldn't say whether the next round of experiments has 
    been approved, and the head of the Canadian work, Dr. Heinz Feldmann, was 
    unavailable for comment. Feldmann is in Kenya trying to contain an outbreak 
    of Rift Valley Fever.
 
 Kobasa is matter-of-fact when asked what it is like to work with an organism 
    as lethal as the 1918 virus.
 
 "Everyone is pretty well-trained and the protocols for working for the virus 
    are clear," he says. "We've done basically everything we can to minimize the 
    risk."
 
 Before entering the level 4 biosafety lab, they strip off their street 
    clothes and put on a set of medical scrubs. Then they climb into bulky blue 
    rubber suits, complete with hood, clear face mask and self-contained 
    breathing system. They pull on yellow boots, snap on latex gloves and are 
    buzzed into the lab.
 
 One the way out of the lab, they take a five-minute shower with a chemical 
    wash to decontaminate their blue suits. That's followed by a regular shower 
    that lasts at least three minutes.
 
 Did Kobasa fear for his safety when he headed to the lab last January to 
    resurrect one of world's worst killers? "Not so much," he says.
 
 
 Email to a friend
 
 © The Edmonton Journal 2007
 
 
 |  
  
    | 1918 flu virus triggers
    overwhelming immune response
 
    
    Globe and Mail: 
    Canadian Press: January 18, 2007 The virus that caused the 1918 influenza pandemic 
    triggered an overwhelming immune response that swamped the lungs of macaque 
    monkeys — the first primates deliberately infected with the Spanish flu 
    virus, Canadian and American scientists reported Wednesday.
 The research, done in part at the Public Health Agency of Canada's National 
    Microbiology Laboratory in Winnipeg, supports the notion that the virulent 
    flu virus turned the body's immune system against itself. Scientists believe 
    that theory explains how the devastating influenza strain managed to mow 
    down unprecedented numbers of healthy people in the prime of life.
 
 Previous work, done by some of the same scientists, showed mice infected 
    with the virus also experienced this hyper immune response, a so-called 
    cytokine storm. (Cytokines are one of the proteins the immune system makes 
    to fight infection.)
 
 “There was an uncontrolled or aberrant inflammatory response,” one of the 
    authors, Dr. Michael Katze of the University of Washington in Seattle, 
    explained in a telephone briefing.
 
 “One possibility (is) . . . instead of protecting the individuals that were 
    infected with the highly pathogenic virus, the immune response is actually 
    contributing to the lethality of the virus.”
 
 Discovering how the Spanish flu, an H1N1 virus, killed an estimated 50 
    million people around the globe isn't an exercise in archeological 
    microbiology. Cracking the mysteries of highly virulent flu strains could 
    help the world prepare to battle the next bad influenza pandemic, said 
    Darwyn Kobasa, a research scientist with the Winnipeg lab and the first 
    author on the paper.
 
 “Not only is the study of interest to understand what happened in 1918 but 
    it's also very relevant today as we possibly prepare for a new influenza 
    pandemic caused by an avian H5N1 virus,” said Mr. Kobasa, referring to the 
    highly pathogenic flu strain that for more than three years has been 
    decimating poultry flocks in parts of Asia and which has killed over 160 
    people.
 
 “The H5N1 virus can also cause very serious disease and it appears to do 
    this in a way that's quite similar to the 1918 virus. We think that a 
    greater understanding of the viruses that caused past pandemics will help us 
    predict what might be expected and how to plan to use our knowledge and 
    resources to reduce the impact of a new pandemic.”
 
 
 
 | The research, published in the journal Nature, involved 
    an ambitious project to painstakingly recreate the 1918 virus — only the 
    second time this feat has been achieved. In 2005 scientists at the U.S. 
    Centers for Disease Control made history by becoming the first team to 
    recreate the virus. 
 The effort that led to this research began a 
    short time later. Yoshihiro Kawaoka, a leading influenza scientist working 
    at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, built each of the virus's eight 
    genes from scratch, using genetic blueprints housed in a public access 
    database.
 He then gave the plasmids — the pieces of DNA in which the genes were placed 
    — to scientists in Winnipeg. They then transferred or “transfected” the 
    genes into cell culture, allowing them to reassemble and grow in a process 
    called virus “rescue.”
 
 The recreated virus was then used to infect seven macaques housed in a Level 
    4 laboratory in Winnipeg — the highest level of biosecurity available. The 
    monkeys became so ill they were euthanized after eight days, at which point 
    lung and other tissues were analyzed to chart the damage done.
 
 Dr. Katze and his team in Seattle also traced the immunologic system 
    response by analyzing which immune proteins were produced when, and to what 
    levels.
 
 Scientists hope that learning which parts of the immune system overreact to 
    this or other virulent flu viruses could provide clues as to how the process 
    could be interrupted and the damage lessened.
 
 “It suggests if you interrupt the inflammatory chain in the innate immune 
    response, then you might have another tool in your armamentarium,” said Dr. 
    Anthony Fauci, director of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and 
    Infectious Diseases and an expert in the workings of the immune system.
 
 But while this work is a start, scientists still don't know how to dampen 
    down the immune response without then letting the virus continue to multiply 
    unchecked.
 
 “If the result is, OK, you get less cytokines which will be good in terms of 
    immunopathology — but because of that you get also even higher levels of 
    virus replication which results in tissue damage, then you've solved one 
    problem but you come out with another one,” said Adolfo Garcia-Sastre, the 
    microbiologist at New York's Mt. Sinai Medical Center who played an 
    instrumental role in the first project to recreate the 1918 virus, but who 
    was not involved in this study.
 
 Print E-mail Comments (12) Share this article
 |  | 
 
 
 There are 0 additional comments. 
   Send your news items
to be posted to news@prajapati-samaj.ca. |