|SEARCHING TRUTH AT PVAF:....WHY BRITISH ARELOOKING FOR A PRINCESS TO BE THEIR FUTURE QUEEN.....because vEDik lifestyle genes striving for upholding vE|
Posted by Vishva News Reporter on December 26, 2010
.....THE TRUTH OF NEXT GENERATION BRITISH ROYALTY ....
|CAN AND/OR SHOULD
A BRITISH PRINCE MAKE
A COMMONER HIS FUTURE QUEEN
.....his father and his grandfather and his
great-grandfather did not
as per the
British Royalty Lineage tradition....
|(For more life
travel comparisons beyond photo please click on the hyperlinked names)
...vEDik TAKE TO FIND THE TRUTH OF
PRESERVATION OF ROYALTY LIFESTYLE IN 21st
WITH DHARm of ROYALTY TRADITIONS AND CUSTOM ....
of Edmonton, Alberta, Canada with a prayer to share the vEDik lifestyle
knowledge from his daily study of Sciences of Life and Creation from the
sNskRUt language corpus of knowledge texts and current life, physical
and metaphysical sciences in his
thusly and living by this study knowledge he empowers himself to be in a
timeless, spaceless and time-space -borderless communion with the
Creator to acquire and
understand the engineering science of the Creator of Life and all
Creations we all co-exists with in seamless harmony but with total
|Everything in this universe, as currently known by current humanity,
from the smallest known matter particles called quarks that make up the
matter in this universe in all its forms and functions and the forces
that keep the matter as we see and experience has been comprehensively engineered with
knowledge from various Life and
Creation Sciences for its being and functionality by the
Creator and His
sub-creators including us human beings.
These Life and Creation Sciences
also include operation and maintenance sciences of all forms and
functions created and cyclic re-creations of all that has existed, exists now
and will exist in the future.
All of these Sciences of Life and
sNskRUt language is called
and the sciences of their functions and operations of all thusly created
texts, which explains for lay people sciences of
the current humanity has a very small fraction of the
knowledge of vED.
And thus the current humanity, while evolving from Neandthral or may be
from monkeys as per Darwin in the known human
history of about last 5000 years or so, are sort of living daily lifestyles
in the mode of by the "seats of their pants" and/or "on the fly" at best....(continued
on next webpage of this truth-finding news-knowledge sharing...)
And after finishing studying this vEDik take in current
lifestyle context...you will be able to continue ... to read the news story
sharing in Washington Post on Prince William and Commoner Kate Middleton wedding
next year and their current and future acceptance by British citizenry as King and Queen of
the British nation....together with looking at the photo gallery of the
William-Kate evolution and their families...a photo are worth thousand
words is proved correct in this case...and related additional
news-knowledge sharing..... please click on the next line...
Britain's Prince William and
his fiancée, Kate Middleton, are to be married April 29 at Westminster
Abbey in London.
future british queen
Kate Middleton's 'commoner' status
stirs up Britons' old class divide
Foreign Service: December 19, 2010:
Anthony Faiola with contribution from special correspondent Rebecca
LONDON, UK- Since the
royal engagement of Prince William and Kate Middleton, one word describing the bride-to-be has stood out more than
any other. She may be beautiful, graceful and fabulously rich, but
Middleton is still a "commoner."
Technically, the label fits. The 28-year-old daughter of former airline
workers made good is not of noble blood and, hence, considered a
commoner in the British tradition of class distinction. Yet the wide use
of such an archaic and, to some, pejorative term is igniting a heated
debate here about pedigree and status in modern Britain.
Royal watchers and the British media are not mincing words about the
humble lineage of "Commoner Kate." ""From
pit to palace," declared London's Daily Mail, noting her great-great-grandfather's days as a coal
miner. "I'm not against the middle class as such, but I do query whether
she has the background and breeding to be queen one day," wrote James
Whitaker, a guru of royal gossip. The Guardian, the Times of London, the
Telegraph and the venerable BBC, among others, have all seen fit to dub
her a "commoner."
As accurate as the term may be, others here are wincing at the notion
that a young woman whose family's self-made fortune is larger than many
in the landed gentry is being so strongly defined by her bloodline in
21st century Britain. It shows, observers say, that despite the rise of
mega-rich commoners such as Richard Branson and J.K. Rowling, this is
still very much a society where status is measured in birthright and
"It's quite depressing, this word, like we're going back to a 19th
century theme-park Britain, to an age of deference to the monarchy,"
said Evening Standard columnist Richard Godwin, who penned a piece about
the term. "But most of all, you look at Kate's background and you see
there is nothing common about her."
In fact, her family's less-than-regal starts have hung over Middleton
since she stepped into the world of Britain's moneyed and titled. Though
hers is no Cinderella story - Middleton's parents, who now run a
successful party supply company, comfortably footed the $32,000-a-year
bill for Marlborough boarding school - Commoner Kate is said to have
long dreamed of the glass slipper. Friends at Marlborough reportedly
even nicknamed her "princess in waiting."
Middleton, however, seemed to get the last laugh at St. Andrews, the
university in Scotland where she met and befriended William. The two
then started dating, the story goes, after he was struck by her beauty
as she modeled a sheer dress at a charity fashion show.
But she was to wait eight years before her prince finally popped the
question, with a close call in 2007 when the couple separated. Some say
Middleton grew tired of waiting for her prince, others say her
background perhaps contributed to his initial lack of commitment.
By accepting a commoner as the prospective mother of an heir to the
British throne, the monarchy, many here say, is getting historically
closer to its subjects. Middleton's ascension could rekindle some of the
lost spark between the crown and people, a cooling that only worsened
after the death of Diana, Princess of Wales.
Still, some comically note that the royal-blooded - perhaps looking for
some hardy commoner DNA after centuries of inbreeding - should instead
stick to themselves. Commenting on a letter to the editor describing
William and Kate's marriage as a "Darwinian exercise in gene-pool
refreshment," Brian Viner, a columnist for the Independent, noted that
his wife believes William should have been forced to stick to "a fat
Spanish princess" or "a slightly boss-eyed one from the Netherlands."
A new title
FOR FUTURE QUEEN
Middleton's family tree is nevertheless presenting Queen Elizabeth II
with a practical problem. Before
the spring marriage, the queen will
need to decide what title to grant Middleton, and Prince William
reportedly is bucking for "Princess Catherine."
Purists, however, note that in Britain, princesses are born, not made on
paper. Diana, for instance, was known during her marriage to Prince
Charles not as "Princess Diana," but "Her Royal Highness the Princess of
Wales." Middleton may be expected to take her husband's name, being
officially known as "Princess William" in the manner of other commoners
who have married lesser members of the British royal family.
"She can't be called Princess Catherine because she isn't a princess in
her own right," said Christopher Wilson, the London-based royal
biographer. "She might be called that by the headline writers, but she
won't really be."
Of course, given Middleton's roots, the rising-above-her-station
storyline was always a headline waiting to happen. Much was made of
Diana's lack of royal bona fides, even though she was the daughter of an
earl and hailed from one of the most pedigreed families in Britain.
At the time, the commoner label was wielded against Diana because she
was not the progeny of a crowned head of Europe. Yet in upper-class
British circles, the chatter about Diana's lineage was almost always in
self-mocking tones; few truly considered her a commoner.
Not so with Middleton. The rumor went that when she entered a room, some
of Prince William's friends would whisper "doors to manual," a reference
to her mother's former career as a flight attendant. It is that sort of
upper-crust dismissal of commoner blood that still shocks and stings
Zoe Williams, the noted columnist for the Guardian, recalled a recent
press trip when regular-Joe journalists bristled against a scribe from
high society who wore a family signet ring. "One of us said to her, 'I
don't know anybody who wears a signet ring,' and she looked back,
totally serious, and said, 'I don't know anybody who doesn't.' "
On jabs about Middleton's roots, Williams added: "What are they still
doing using these terms? I am against letting them off the hook . . .
What I prefer about America is that when people are snobbish, it's a bit
more about money. But here, it's still about a signet ring, a family
More posh than most BRITISH
Though some say it is out of pride in and fascination about her
ascension to the royal ranks, the British papers have had a field day
reporting on Middleton's gritty roots as the descendant of coal miners
and laborers. The Sun tabloid did a piece on Pete Beedle, Middleton's
distant cousin who owns a fish-and-chip shop in the rough-and-tumble
Yet others insist sensitivity to the term "commoner" is misplaced. It is
unfortunately close; Wilson said, to the word "common" - which is a high
insult in Britain, denoting someone of poor taste and manners. But in
fact, he said, Middleton delights many in the upper echelon of society,
who are excited about having "the dirt of the coal mine" in the DNA of
future kings and queens.
Still, much of the quibbling over the word is directed less at the
suggestion that the royals are somehow better than Middleton, and more
at the notion that the very wealthy Middletons are somehow just like
every other commoner in Britain.
Indeed, many here proudly embrace their pint-in-the-pub, working-class
image, slapping the mild jab "posh" on anyone deemed too refined. That
sort of Briton sees the well-to-do Middletons as being just as alien to
their world as the denizens of Buckingham Palace.
"If you look closely, Kate Middleton is no commoner," commentator Janet
Street Porter argued in a BBC spot. "She went to [private] school, then
to posh university and has been photographed in swanky nightclubs where
drinks cost 20 pounds a pop . . . Normal? Not really."
Regardless, the debate is giving Britain the opportunity to navel-gaze
on one of its favorite topics: class.
Anyone who doubts the British fascination with their own social
structures need only flip on a living-room telly on this side of the
Atlantic, where one of the hottest new shows, "Downton Abbey," depicts
the lives of servants who ought to know their place and the aristocratic
masters who employ them. In a similar vein, the BBC this month will air
a revival of "Upstairs, Downstairs," the hit 1970s drama about the
denizens of a grand London house.
"Believe me, you don't need a royal wedding to drag up the issue of
class," said Dickie Arbiter, the queen's former spokesman. "In Britain,
someone is always going on about it."
.....YOU CAN ENJOY AND LEARN FROM
THE 191 "COMMENTS" BY READERS OF WASHINGTON POST
ON THE ABOVE ARTICLE BY CLICKING
....PVAF PRAYS THAT
TODAY YOU GAINED SOME MORE LIFE KNOWLEDGE
TO MAKE YOUR
TOMORROW LIFE HAPPIER WITH MORE KNOWLEDGE.....
....See you in the next publishing of search for Life Knowledge at
There are 0 additional comments.
Send your news items
to be posted to firstname.lastname@example.org.